Ankle Biting Pundits and
The Hill both have items up today talking about John Sununu's re-election race, and the Senator's vulnerability heading into next year over his perceived lockstep record of voting with the Republican majority (and the President). Both items hone in on the issue of Iraq, and what that could do to Sununu; the Hill piece also focuses on items related to health care.
Readers will know that the Sununu race is one I'm following particularly closely, and might suspect that I find it completely astonishing that anyone would perceive Sununu as being a Bush-ite, or a run-of-the-mill Republican in any way, shape or form. Still, that's how New Hampshire Democrats are trying to paint him-- and it seems that they're having some success.
On the subject of Iraq, which is probably Sununu's greatest vulnerability, both pieces fail to point out that Sununu is clearly not in lockstep with the President (something that not many people seem to have noticed). In fact, Sununu is a cosponsor of
a bill that would base future Iraq strategy on the Iraq Study Group report.
This is significant -- and Sununu should be talking much, much more about his backing of this bill-- for three reasons:
1.
This bill seeks to set conditions that would enable US forces to begin coming out of Iraq as early as March 2008. In other words Sununu's sponsorship of it shows that he is not one of those Republicans who's willing to stay the course, even if it takes 10 years. In fact, it shows that he wants to get troops out of Iraq, and in the relatively near future, but isn't the kind of hothead (like certain Democrats) who are prepared to deny troops body armor in ...
> Read more & share